This search addressed “Vibration datasets for gear and bearing fault diagnosis, for equipment health monitoring and fault-classification model training.”, covering about 3 source platforms with 3 candidates returned; after a per-must-have assessment, 1 meet all must-haves and 2 largely match. The full candidate list and item-by-item basis follow below.
Note: standard search is billed per search, not by whether a match is found; information retrieval does not guarantee a match, and credits are non-refundable on no-match (refunded only if a system fault prevents the report). We provide source links, the search process and per-item verdicts — not raw data; obtain the data yourself under each source’s license.
▸About this sample · delivery boundaryexpand
This page is a sample availability report with the same structure as a real search report; candidates, verdicts and sources are compiled from public data sources with click-through links. Downloadability, field completeness and commercial licensing are subject to each source’s official terms. For item-by-item verified, ready-to-use datasets, our team can deliver a custom build.
The requirement
Framed through the requirements assistant into a base requirement plus must-have / nice-to-have conditions. A match means all must-haves are met; nice-to-haves are a bonus.
Base requirement
Vibration datasets for gear and bearing fault diagnosis, for equipment health monitoring and fault-classification model training.
Must-have · verdict baseline
- Covers common gear fault types (broken / missing tooth, root crack, wear, pitting)
- Includes multi-channel / multi-axis vibration signals
- Free for academic research
- Clear license, source attributable
Nice-to-have · bonus
This search’s result
A page-level search result; a match means all must-haves are met. For field-by-field verified, ready-to-use datasets, our team can deliver a custom build (quoted separately).
Search coverage: Real search across authoritative dataset repositories, university official sources and open data portals; verify completeness at GitHub / official sources first, and check the license separately for commercial use.
Per-must-have verdict
Each candidate first gives its reasoning, then a “Met / TBD / Not met” verdict per must-have with the basis. Match = all your must-haves are met; Near match = on the right track but a condition or two short.
Listed 3 candidate(s), of which 1 match.
SEU Southeast University Gearbox Dataset
Gear + bearing subsets; 4 gear fault types + healthy, 8-channel vibration
Assessment: The gear subset has 8-channel vibration signals and covers 4 gear fault types (broken / missing tooth, root crack, wear) plus a healthy state — the source folder is labeled “4 kinds of gear faults”; pitting is not present, so “covers the 5 specified types” is marked TBD and it is listed as a near match. Free for academic use with citation.
Gaps: Pitting is not present — one short of the must-have “5 fault types”; needs checking on the dataset page. Commercial use needs separate confirmation; file format per the repo docs.
MCC5-THU Tsinghua Gearbox Benchmark
Variable-condition gearbox benchmark; covers broken / missing tooth, root crack, wear, pitting + compound faults, CC BY 4.0
Assessment: The dataset page (Mendeley p92gj2732w) explicitly lists missing teeth, wear, pitting, root cracks and broken teeth — five fault types plus compound faults — meeting your five specified types item by item; the license is a clear CC BY 4.0, so it is listed as a match.
Note: The benchmark skews to variable conditions, with fewer single steady-condition samples; downloads and fields per the dataset page.
OEDI Gearbox Fault Diagnosis Data
US DOE open data, downloads without login
Assessment: Collected with a SpectraQuest gearbox simulator, 4-axis vibration locating gear crack / broken tooth; government open data that downloads without login.
Gaps: Fault-type coverage per the dataset page; simulator data differs from real operating conditions.
Turn matches into deep verification
Our team can verify the sources and files item by item, confirm your must-haves are met, and deliver. Email contact@deepsdata.com or add us on WeCom.
Conclusion & next steps
A page-level conclusion; downloadability, field completeness and commercial license are subject to each source’s official terms.
Conclusion
1 candidate (MCC5-THU Tsinghua) meets every must-have item by item — the dataset page lists the five specified fault types plus compound faults, license CC BY 4.0 — prefer it. SEU Southeast University (no pitting) and OEDI (only crack / broken tooth) are a strong fit in direction but whether they cover your five specified fault types needs verification, so they are listed as near matches our team can confirm on the dataset pages.
Next-step advice
Leave your details for our team to run a deep search and download verification, confirming each of your must-haves before delivery.
Team deep-verification
Download verification, field completeness and full matches are confirmed after the team opens and checks them.
Note
Paderborn University bearing data (32 states) is CC BY-NC 4.0 — non-commercial academic only, citation required, not for commercial use; CWRU and Paderborn official sites may be slow from mainland China. Whether mainland platforms host matching gearbox sets needs your own check. We do not deliver raw data — obtain it yourself under each source’s license.
Want your own availability report?
Tell us your data need and must-have conditions; we assess availability first, then organize the data to be ready to use. Not quite the fit you need? Our team can build a custom dataset — sourced, organized and verified against your must-haves, feasibility assessed first, then you decide.
